July 28, 2015

Dan Frumin

Darcs rebase by example

July 28, 2015 10:40 AM UTC

Darcs is a patch-centric version control system. In Darcs, there is no “correct” linear history of a repository – rather, there is a poset of patches. That means that most of the time you are pushing and pulling changes you can cherry-pick patches without a problem. However, in some cases you cannot perform a pull (or some other operation on the repository) smoothly. Sometimes it is necessary to rewrite the “history” – i.e. modify a patch that is a dependency of one or more other patches. For those cases darcs rebase comes in handy. To put it in the words of the implementor “Rebase is a workaround for cases where commutation doesn’t do enough”.

A repository can change it’s state from rebase-in-progress back to normal if there are no suspended patches left. However, be aware that you cannot unsuspend a patch1 if you have unrecorded changes in the repository. In light of this, I suggest recording a temporary patch with current changes

darcs record -am DRAFT

You can suspend that patch at the beginning of your rebase process and apply it at the end.

General overview of rebase

darcs rebase is an operation (or, rather, a family of operations) that allows one to make changes “deep down” in the repository history. One of the crucial things that allows for rebase to work is the fact that since darcs 2.10 patches can be suspended. When one performs any of the darcs rebase commands, the repository moves to a special rebase-in-progress state. In this state repository contains a pristine, a set of patches, a working copy, and — in addition to all the usual stuff — a set of suspended patches. Suspended patches are not active in the repository — that is, they are not applied.

Let’s go over the rebase subcommands

rebase log/rebase changes

This is simple: list the suspended patches

rebase suspend

Moves selected patches into the suspended state. Once the patch is suspended it is no longer active in the repository.

Note: once you suspend a patch, it changes its identity. That means that even if you suspend a patch and unsuspend it immediately, you will get a different repository that you have started with. Let this be a good reason (one of a couple!) for doing rebase on a separate branch.

> cat file
> darcs rebase suspend
	patch 64523bc4622fad02a4bdb9261887628b7997ebdd
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Thu Jul 23 18:49:30 MSK 2015
  * 123
Shall I suspend this patch? (1/5)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: y
patch cc54d7cf4b9e3d13a24ce0b1b77b76581d98d75d
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Thu Jul 23 18:43:53 MSK 2015
  * Test
Shall I suspend this patch? (2/5)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: d
Rebase in progress: 1 suspended patches
> darcs rebase log
patch 64523bc4622fad02a4bdb9261887628b7997ebdd
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Thu Jul 23 18:49:30 MSK 2015
  * 123
Shall I view this patch? (1/?) [yN…], or ? for more options: y
Daniil Frumin **20150723154930
 Ignore-this: 43e09e6503ac74688e74441dc29bce25
] hunk ./file 2
Rebase in progress: 1 suspended patches
> cat file

rebase unsuspend

Does the opposite of suspend: applies a suspended patch to the repository and changes its state to normal.

> darcs rebase unsuspend                                                                                       
patch 64523bc4622fad02a4bdb9261887628b7997ebdd
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Thu Jul 23 18:49:30 MSK 2015
  * 123
Shall I unsuspend this patch? (1/1)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: y
Do you want to unsuspend these patches? [Yglqk…], or ? for more options: y
Rebase finished!

rebase apply

Rebase apply takes a patch bundle and tries to apply all the patches in the bundle to the current repository. If a patch from the bundle conflicts with a local patch, then the local patch gets suspended. You will thus have a chance to resolve the conflict by amending your conflicting patches, at a price of.. well, changing the identity of your local patches.

rebase pull

Sort of like rebase apply, but instead of a patch bundle it obtains the patches from a remote repository.

Specifically, rebase pull applies all the remote patches, one-by-one, suspending any local patches that conflict. We will see more of rebase pull in the second example.

Example 1: suspending local changes

Imagine the following situation: at point A you add a configuration file to your repository, then you record a patch B that updates the settings in the configuration file. After that you make some more records before you realize that you’ve included by accident your private password in patch A! You want to get rid of it in your entire history, but you can’t just unrecord A, because B depends on A, and possibly some other patches depend on B.

The contents of the configuration file after patch A:

port = 6667
host =
password = awesomevcs 

Patch B, diff:

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
-port = 6667
+port = 6697
+usessl = True
host =
password = awesomevcs

You cannot just amend patch A, because the patch B depends on A:

> darcs amend                                                                                                         
patch 1925d640f1f3180cb5b9e64260c1b5f374fce4ca
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:23:07 MSK 2015
  * B

Shall I amend this patch? [yNjk…], or ? for more options: n

Skipping depended-upon patch:
patch 22d7c8da83141f8b1f80bdd3eff02064d4f45c6b
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:22:24 MSK 2015
  * A

Cancelling amend since no patch was selected.

What we will have to do is temporarily suspend patch B, amend patch A, and then unsuspend B.

> darcs rebase suspend
patch 1925d640f1f3180cb5b9e64260c1b5f374fce4ca
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:23:07 MSK 2015
  * B

Shall I suspend this patch? (1/2)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: y
patch 22d7c8da83141f8b1f80bdd3eff02064d4f45c6b
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:22:24 MSK 2015
  * A

Shall I suspend this patch? (2/2)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: d
Rebase in progress: 1 suspended patches

At this point, the state of our repository is the following: there is one (active) patch A, and one suspended patch B.

> darcs rebase changes -a
patch 4c5d45230dc146932b21964aea938e2a978523eb
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:28:58 MSK 2015
  * B

Rebase in progress: 1 suspended patches
> darcs changes -a
patch 21f56dfb425e4c49787bae5db4f8869e96787fb2
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:28:49 MSK 2015
  * A

Rebase in progress: 1 suspended patches
> cat config
port = 6667
host =
password = awesomevcs
> $EDITOR config # remove the password bit
> darcs amend
patch 22d7c8da83141f8b1f80bdd3eff02064d4f45c6b
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:22:24 MSK 2015
  * A

Shall I amend this patch? [yNjk…], or ? for more options: y
hunk ./config 3
-password = awesomevcs
Shall I record this change? (1/1)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: y
Do you want to record these changes? [Yglqk…], or ? for more options: y
Finished amending patch:
patch 21f56dfb425e4c49787bae5db4f8869e96787fb2
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:28:49 MSK 2015
  * A

Rebase in progress: 1 suspended patches

Now that we’ve removed the password from the history, we can safely unsuspend patch B (in this particular situation we actually know that applying B to the current state of the repository won’t be a problem, because B does not conflict with our modified A)

> darcs rebase unsuspend
patch 1925d640f1f3180cb5b9e64260c1b5f374fce4ca
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 21 13:23:07 MSK 2015
  * B

Shall I unsuspend this patch? (1/1)  [ynW…], or ? for more  options: y
Do you want to unsuspend these patches? [Yglqk…], or ? for more options: y
Rebase finished!

And that’s done!

> cat config
port = 6697
usessl = True
host =

You may use this rebase strategy for removing sensitive information from the repository, for removing that 1GB binary .iso that you added to your repository by accident, or for combining two patches into one deep down in the patchset.

Example 2: developing against a changing upstream – rebase pull

Imagine you have a fork R’ of a repository R that you are working on. You are implementing a feature that involves a couple of commits. During your work you record a commit L1 that refractors some common datum from modules A.hs and B.hs. You proceed with your work recording a patch L2. At this point you realise that after you forked R, the upstream recorded two more patches U1 and U2, messing with the common datum in A.hs. If you just pull U1 into your fork R’, you will have a conflict, that you will have to resolve by recording another patch on top.

     / \
    /   \
   L1   U1

Note: if you run darcs rebase pull in R’, then the only patches that will be suspended are the ones which are already in R’. Because suspended patches gain new identity, make sure that you do not have other people’s conflicting patches present in R’.

The way to solve this would be to first do darcs rebase pull, which would suspend the conflicting patches, and then start unsuspending the patches one by one, making sure that you fix any conflicts that may arise after each unsuspend.

Consider a concrete example with two repositories rep1 and rep1_0.

rep1_0 > darcs changes 
patch ebaccd5c36667b7e3ee6a49d25ef262f0c7edf2b
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Mon Jul 27 20:56:25 MSK 2015
  * commit2

patch a7e0d92a53b0523d0224ef8ffae4362adf854485
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Mon Jul 27 20:56:25 MSK 2015
  * commit1
	rep1_0 > darcs diff —from-patch=commit2
patch ebaccd5c36667b7e3ee6a49d25ef262f0c7edf2b
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Mon Jul 27 20:56:25 MSK 2015
  * commit2
diff -rN -u old-rep1_0/dir1/file2 new-rep1_0/dir1/file2
— old-rep1_0/dir1/file2	1970-01-01 03:00:00.000000000 +0300
    +++ new-rep1_0/dir1/file2	2015-07-28 12:25:54.000000000 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+double whatsup
	rep1_0 > cd ../rep1
rep1 > darcs changes
patch e3df0e23a3915910a81eb8181d7b3669e8f270a9
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 28 12:27:55 MSK 2015
  * commit2’

patch a7e0d92a53b0523d0224ef8ffae4362adf854485
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Mon Jul 27 20:56:25 MSK 2015
  * commit1
rep1 > darcs diff —from-patch=“commit2’”
patch e3df0e23a3915910a81eb8181d7b3669e8f270a9
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 28 12:27:55 MSK 2015
  * commit2’
diff -rN -u old-rep1/dir1/file2 new-rep1/dir1/file2
— old-rep1/dir1/file2	1970-01-01 03:00:00.000000000 +0300
+++ new-rep1/dir1/file2	2015-07-28 12:28:39.000000000 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+touch file2
\ No newline at end of file
diff -rN -u old-rep1/file1 new-rep1/file1 — old-rep1/file1	2015-07-28 12:28:39.000000000 +0300 +++ new-rep1/file1	2015-07-28 12:28:39.000000000 +0300
@@ -1 +1 @@
\ No newline at end of file
+double whatsup
\ No newline at end of file

The patch commit2 from rep1_0 conflicts with commit2’ from rep1.

rep1 > darcs rebase pull ../rep1_0
patch ebaccd5c36667b7e3ee6a49d25ef262f0c7edf2b
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Mon Jul 27 20:56:25 MSK 2015
  * commit2
Shall I pull this patch? (1/1)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: y
Do you want to pull these patches? [Yglqk…], or ? for more options: y
The following local patches are in conflict:
patch e3df0e23a3915910a81eb8181d7b3669e8f270a9
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 28 12:27:55 MSK 2015
  * commit2’
Shall I suspend this patch? (1/1)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: y
Do you want to suspend these patches? [Yglqk…], or ? for more options: y
Finished pulling.
Rebase in progress: 1 suspended patches

Now we have one patch — commit2’ — in the suspended state. We want to resolve the conflict by amending commit2’. We will do that by unsuspending it and manually editing out the conflicting lines. This will also make it depend on commit2.

rep1 > darcs rebase unsuspend
patch e3df0e23a3915910a81eb8181d7b3669e8f270a9
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 28 12:27:55 MSK 2015
  * commit2’
Shall I unsuspend this patch? (1/1)  [ynW…], or ? for more options: y
Do you want to unsuspend these patches? [Yglqk…], or ? for more options: d
We have conflicts in the following files:

Rebase finished!
rep1 > cat dir1/file2
v v v v v v v

double whatsup
touch file2
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
rep1 > $EDITOR dir1/file2
rep1 > darcs amend -a
patch 40b3b4123c78dba6a6797feb619572072654a9cd
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 28 12:32:56 MSK 2015
  * commit2’
Shall I amend this patch? [yNjk…], or ? for more options: y
Finished amending patch:
patch c35867259f187c1bc30310f1cacb34c1bb2cce41
Author: Daniil Frumin 
Date:   Tue Jul 28 12:34:30 MSK 2015
  * commit2’
rep1 > darcs mark-conflicts
No conflicts to mark.

Another repository saved from conflicting patches, yay!

  1. See this discussion for details

Tagged: darcs, haskell, rebase

July 12, 2015

Dan Frumin

Darcs 2.10.1 (Mac OSX build)

July 12, 2015 06:13 PM UTC

Darcs 2.10.1 has been released!

Citing the official release notes

> The darcs team is pleased to announce the release of darcs 2.10.1 !
> ..
> # What's new in 2.10.1 (since 2.10.0) #
> - generalized doFastZip for darcsden support
> - support terminfo 0.4, network 2.6, zlib 0.6, quickcheck 2.8 and
> attoparsec 0.13
> - errorDoc now prints a stack trace (if profiling was enabled) (Ben Franksen)
> - beautified error messages for command line and default files (Ben Franksen)
> - fixed the following bugs:
>       - issue2449: test harness/shelly: need to handle
> mis-encoded/binary data (Ganesh Sittampalam)
>       - issue2423: diff only respecting --diff-command when a diff.exe
> is present (Alain91)
>       - issue2447: get contents of deleted file (Ben Franksen)
>       - issue2307: add information about 'darcs help manpage' and
> 'darcs help markdown' (Dan Frumin)
>       - issue2461: darcs log --repo=remoterepo creates and populates
> _darcs (Ben Franksen)
>       - issue2459: cloning remote repo fails to use packs if cache is
> on a different partition (Ben Franksen)
> # Feedback #
> If you have an issue with darcs 2.10.0, you can report it on
> . You can also report bugs by email to
> bugs at, or come to #darcs on

I’ve updated Mac OS to version 2.10.1. You can install it with

brew install

Tagged: darcs, haskell, homebrew

July 11, 2015

Dan Frumin

HTTP Basic auth in Snap

July 11, 2015 09:27 AM UTC

Recently, I’ve implemented HTTP Basic auth for darcsden and wrote a simple wreq test for it. In this post I would like to outline the main technical details.

Server side

Transient storage

A lot of darcsden code is (especially the parts that are closer to the users’ web browser — handlers, pages, so on) is written around sessions. Sessions are stored in a special storage — implemented by the DarcsDen.Backend.Transient, but if we abstract away from the details we have a Session datatype. Authorization and authentication information is handled by sessions using functions setUser :: (BTIO bt) => Maybe User -> Session -> Snap Session, notice :: (BTIO bt) => String -> Session -> Snap () (display a message to the user) and others. The BTIO bt part is just a synonym for

type BTIO bt = (BackendTransient bt, ?backendTransient :: bt, MonadIO (BackendTransientM bt))

Which basically says that we are operating with a transient backend that supports all of necessary operations, and we can also do IO in it. Right now there are only two transient backends (read: two ways of storing sessions): Redis and in-process memory.

Running sessions

If we have a piece of Snap code that we want to “sessionify” we use the following interface:

withSession :: (BTIO bt) => (Session -> Snap ()) -> Snap ()

What this does is it basically checks for a cookie — in case it is present it grabs the session information from the storage (in accordance with the cookie); if the cookie is not present it creates a new session and stores it in a cookie.

If we have a page of a type Session -> Snap (), we might want to give user an option to do HTTP authentication on that page. We introduce another function

withBasicAuth :: (BP bp, BTIO bt) 
              => (Session -> Snap ()) 
              -> (Session -> Snap ())
withBasicAuth act s = do
    rq  do
          rawHeader <- maybe throwChallenge return $ getHeader “Authorization” rq
          let (Just (usr,pw)) = getCredentials rawHeader
          c  errorPage “Unknown user”
            Just u -> if checkPassword (fromBS pw) u
                         then doLogin (fromBS usr)
                         else errorPage “Bad password”
      _ -> act s

So, what is going on in here? First of all, we check if the “login” parameter is set to “true”. If it does, we try to get the “Authorization” header, de-encode it, and check whether the credentials are good.

throwChallenge :: Snap a
throwChallenge = do
    modifyResponse $ (setResponseStatus 401 “Unauthorized”) .
                     (setHeader “WWW-Authenticate” “Basic realm=darcsdenrealm”)
    getResponse >>= finishWith

If the response header is present, it is of a form Basic x, where x is a base64 encoded string user:password. We can extract the credentials from the header like this:

import qualified Data.ByteString          as B
import qualified Data.ByteString.Base64   as B
getCredentials :: B.ByteString  — ^ Header
               -> Maybe (B.ByteString, B.ByteString) — ^ Possibly (username, password)
getCredentials header =
    if (isInfixOf “Basic “ header)
      then fmap extract (hush (B.decode (B.drop 6 header)))
      else Nothing
    extract cred = case (B.breakByte (c2w ‘:’) cred) of
                     (usr, pw) -> (usr, safeTail pw)

On the client

The tests that I am currently writing for darcsden are all of the same form: I use wreq to do requests to the darcsden server, then, if necessary, I run taggy to extract information from the webpage, and compare it to the “canonical” information.

As it turns out, doing HTTP Basic Auth is very easy with wreq! First of all, we define a function for doing a GET request that will do some exception handling for us:

getSafeOpts :: Options -> String -> IO (Either Status (Response ByteString))
getSafeOpts opts url = fmap Right (getWith opts url) `catch` hndlr
    hndlr (StatusCodeException s _ _) = return (Left s)
    hndlr e = throwIO e

This way, we won’t get a runtime exception when accessing a non-existing page or getting a server error. Doing a GET request with HTTP Basic Auth is now very easy:

getWithAuth :: (String, String) -> String -> IO (Either Status (Response ByteString))
getWithAuth (username,pw) url = getSafeOpts opts url
    opts = defaults & auth ?~ basicAuth (toBS username) (toBS pw)
                    & param “login” .~ [“true”]

In that snippet we use lenses to set up an auth header and an HTTP parameter (?login=true).

Finally, after obtaining a Response ByteString, we can parse it with taggy-lens:

parsed :: Fold (Response L.ByteString) Text.Taggy.Node
parsed = responseBody 
       . to (decodeUtf8With lenientDecode)
       . html

We can then play with it in GHCi

*Main> Right r  r ^.. parsed
[NodeElement (Element {eltName = “DOCTYPE”, eltAttrs = fromList [(“html”,””)], eltChildren = [NodeElement (Element {eltName = “html”, eltAttrs = fromList [], eltChildren = [NodeElement (Element {eltName = “head”, eltAttrs = fromList [], eltChildren = [NodeElement (Element {eltName = “title”, eltAttrs = fromList [], eltChildren = [NodeContent “localhost”]}),NodeElement (Element {eltName = “link”, eltAttrs = fromList [(“href”,”http://localhost:8900/public/images/favicon.ico”),…

If we want to check that we are indeed logged in correctly, we should look for the “log out” button. Taggy does all the heavy lifting for us, we just have to write down a lens (more precisely, a fold) to “extract” a logout button from the page

logoutButton :: HasElement e => Fold e Text
logoutButton = allAttributed (ix “class” . only “logout”)
             . allNamed (only “a”)
             . contents

logoutButton searches for <div class=“logout”> and returns the text in the link inside the div. There might be many such links inside the node, hence we use a fold.

*Main> r ^.. parsed . logoutButton
[“log out”]

In this case, since we only care if such link is present, we can use a preview

*Main> r ^? parsed . logoutButton
Just “log out”


Well, that’s about it for now. I regret taking way too much time writing this update, and I hope to deliver another one soon. Meanwhile, some information regarding the darcsden SoC project can be found on the wiki.

Tagged: darcs, haskell

July 09, 2015

Darcs News

darcs 2.10.1 release

July 09, 2015 05:10 PM UTC

Hi all,

The darcs team is pleased to announce the release of darcs 2.10.1 !


The easiest way to install darcs 2.10.1 from source is by first installing the Haskell Platform ( If you have installed the Haskell Platform or cabal-install, you can install this release by doing:

$ cabal update
$ cabal install darcs-2.10.1

Alternatively, you can download the tarball from and build it by hand as explained in the README file.

The 2.10 branch is also available as a darcs repository from

What's new in darcs 2.10.1 (since darcs 2.10.0)


If you have an issue with darcs 2.10.1, you can report it on . You can also report bugs by email to, or come to #darcs on

June 22, 2015

Dan Frumin

Darcs binaries for OSX with Homebrew

June 22, 2015 12:33 PM UTC

Recently I’ve updated my Darcs homebrew build to Darcs 2.10. You can install it with

brew install

The formula contains a context (--exact-version) and it is a static binary.

Tagged: darcs, haskell, homebrew

May 13, 2015

Dan Frumin

Hoogle inside the sandbox

May 13, 2015 09:54 PM UTC


This is my first post from the (hopefuly fruitful!) series of blog posts as part of my Haskell SoC project. I will spend a great chunk of my summer hacking away on DarcsDen; in addition, I will document my hardships and successes here. You can follow my progress on my DarcsHub.

This particular post will be about my working environment.

The problem

Hoogle is an amazing tool that usually needs no introduction. Understandably, the online version at indexes only so many packages. This means that if I want to use hoogle to search for functions and values in packages like darcs and darcsden, I will have to set up a local copy.

Cabal sandboxing is a relatively recent feature of the Cabal package manager, but I don’t think it is reasonable in this day to install from the source (let alone develop) a Haskell package without using sandboxing.

The problem seems to be that the mentioned tools do not play well together out of the box, and some amount of magic is required. In this note I sketch the solution, on which I’ve eventually arrived after a couple of tries.

Using hoogle inside a Cabal sandbox

The presumed setup: a user is working on a package X using the cabal sandboxes. The source code is located in the directory X and the path to the cabal sandbox is X/.cabal-sandbox.

Step 1: Install hoogle inside the sandbox. This is simply a matter of running cabal install hoogle inside X. If you want to have a standard database alongside the database for your packages in development, now is the time to do .cabal-sandbox/bin/hoogle data.

Step 2: Generate haddocks for the packages Y,Z you want to use with hoogle. In my case, I wanted to generate haddocks for darcs and darcsden. This is just a matter of running cabal haddock --hoogle in the correct directory.

Step 3: Convert haddocks to .hoo files. Run the following commands in X/:

.cabal-sandbox/bin/hoogle convert /path/to/packageY/dist/doc/html/*/*.txt

You should see something like

Converting /path/to/packageY/dist/doc/html/Y/Y.txt
Converting Y... done

after which the file Y.hoo appears in /path/to/packageY/dist/doc/html/Y/

Step 4: Moving and combining databases. The hoogle database should be stored in .cabal-sandbox/share/*/hoogle-*/databases. Create such directory, if it’s not present already. Then copy the ‘default’ database to that folder:

cp .cabal-sandbox/hoogle/databases/default.hoo .cabal-sandbox/share/*/hoogle-*/databases

Finally, you can combine your Y.hoo with the default database.

.cabal-sandbox/bin/hoogle combine /path/to/packageY/dist/doc/html/*/*.hoo .cabal-sandbox/share/*/hoogle-*/databases/default.hoo
mv default.hoo .cabal-sandbox/share/*/hoogle-*/databases/default.hoo

And you are done! You can test your installation

$ .cabal-sandbox/bin/hoogle rOwner
DarcsDen.State.Repo rOwner :: Simple Lens (Repository bp) String

For additional usability, consider adding .cabal-sandbox/bin to your $PATH.

Tagged: cabal, darcs, haskell, hoogle

April 20, 2015

Simon Michael

ssh, Darcs Hub vulnerability

April 20, 2015 11:10 PM UTC

I recently learned of a serious undocumented vulnerability in the ssh package. This is a minimal ssh server implementation used by darcsden to support darcs push/pull. If you use the ssh package, or you have darcsden’s darcsden-ssh server running, you should upgrade to/rebuild with the imminent ssh-0.3 release right away. Or if you know of someone like that, please let them know.

darcsden is of course the basis for Darcs Hub. Here’s the announcement I sent to users there a few days ago, with more details.

Hello darcs hub users,

This is Simon Michael, operator of, with the first all-darcs-hub-users announcement. You’re receiving this because you have an email address configured in your darcs hub user settings.

Thank you for using darcs hub, and for any feedback/bug reports/patches you may have sent. Usage is growing steadily, and I plan to blog more about it soon at

This email is to announce a recently patched security vulnerability in darcs hub’s SSH server.


3/21: a software developer reports that the haskell “ssh” library used by darcs hub does not check for a valid signature on the public key during authentication. This means it was possible to authenticate as any other ssh user if you knew their public key.

3/21-: I discuss the issue with a small number of core darcs developers and the ssh author.

3/25: A preliminary fix is deployed. We believe this closed the vulnerability.

4/6: A more comprehensive and tested fix is deployed.

4/15: This announcement is sent to current darcs hub users with valid email addresses (714 of 765 users).

4/20: Public disclosure via blog, haskell mail lists and the issue tracker (darcsden #130).

Impact and current status:

We believe the vulnerability is now fixed. But we are not cryptographers - I’m sure the new ssh maintainer would welcome any help from some of those.

We have no reason to believe anyone discovered or exploited the vulnerability. Also, it seems unlikely there’s anything hosted on darcs hub that would attract this kind of attention. darcs hub logs are not good enough to be certain, however. It’s possible I’ll find a way to be more certain by looking at file timestamps or something.

The weakness was present in darcs hub’s ssh server since it went live (and in before that). As mentioned, it was possible to authenticate via ssh as another user if you provided their public ssh key. With ssh access, it’s possible to create, delete, modify or replace any repository in that darcs hub account (but not possible to change user settings in the web app, or to access the system hosting darcshub).

The worst-case scenario we’ve imagined is that a motivated attacker could have authenticated as you and replaced your repo with one that looks just like it, but with patches altered or added, any time since you created the repo on darcs hub (or on, if you moved it from there).

So if you’re paranoid/careful you may want to check the integrity of your repos, eg by reviewing the repo history (“changes” button on the website, “darcs log [-s] [-v]” at the console). If you have more questions about this, you can contact me ( and if necessary Ganesh Sittampalam ( privately.

Future plans:


Some logistical things to be aware of:

Needless to say, I regret the vulnerability and am pleased to have it closed. Of course we are not alone, eg github had their own incident. Thank you very much to all who have been helping with this, especially the original reporter for letting us all know, and Ganesh for providing swift and high quality fixes.

April 19, 2015

Darcs News

darcs 2.10.0 release

April 19, 2015 10:01 PM UTC

Hi all,

The darcs team is pleased to announce the release of darcs 2.10.0.


The easiest way to install darcs 2.10.0 from source is by first installing the Haskell Platform ( If you have installed the Haskell Platform or cabal-install, you can install this release by doing:

$ cabal update
$ cabal install darcs-2.10.0

Alternatively, you can download the tarball from and build it by hand as explained in the README file.

The 2.10 branch is also available as a darcs repository from


If you have an issue with darcs 2.10.0, you can report it via the web on . You can also report bugs by email to bugs at, or come to #darcs on

What's new since darcs 2.8.5

New features

User Interface


Issues resolved in Darcs 2.10

Known issues

These are known new issues in darcs 2.10.0:

March 04, 2015

Darcs News

Darcs News #110

March 04, 2015 12:18 PM UTC

News and discussions

  1. The Darcs 2.10 release is near! Please test the release branch and tell us if you find a bug.
  2. Joachim Breitner has shut down his darcswatch service after 7 years of activity:

Issues resolved (11)

issue822 Ernesto Rodriguez
issue2260 Ganesh Sittampalam
issue2385 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2410 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2411 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2414 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2418 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2422 Ganesh Sittampalam
issue2427 Ben Franksen
issue2431 Ben Franksen
issue2432 Ganesh Sittampalam
issue2437 Guillaume Hoffmann

Patches applied (111)

See darcs wiki entry for details.

November 18, 2014

Darcs News

Darcs News #107

November 18, 2014 03:45 AM UTC

News and discussions

  1. Darcs has received two grants from the Google Summer of Code program, as part of the umbrella organization Alejandro Gadea will work on history reordering:
  2. Marcio Diaz will work on the cache system:
  3. Repository cloning to remote ssh hosts has been present for years as darcs put. This feature has now a more efficient implementation:

Issues resolved (11)

issue851 Dan Frumin
issue1066 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue1268 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue1416 Ale Gadea
issue1987 Marcio Diaz
issue2263 Ale Gadea
issue2345 Dan Frumin
issue2357 Dan Frumin
issue2365 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2367 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2379 Guillaume Hoffmann

Patches applied (41)

See darcs wiki entry for details.

Darcs News #109

November 18, 2014 03:45 AM UTC

News and discussions

  1. We are in the feature freeze period of darcs 2.10:
  1. Our two Summer of Code projects ended up two months ago. Marcio and Ale's code will be part of the upcoming new stable version of darcs. In case you missed them, here are the latest posts of Marcio for his project:
  1. Ale's posts:

Issues resolved (7)

issue1514 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue1624 Marcio Diaz
issue2153 Andreas Brandt
issue2249 Mateusz Lenik
issue2380 Owen Stephens
issue2403 Ganesh Sittampalam
issue2409 Ganesh Sittampalam

Patches applied (118)

See darcs wiki entry for details.

August 19, 2014

Ale Gadea

Last Few Weeks

August 19, 2014 05:44 AM UTC

In the last three weeks I was working in a couple of things, unfortunately I couldn't complete any to 100% :

- Finishing the command minimize-context.
- Implement the "show dependencies" for darcsden.
- Solve the issue2405.

Finish the command minimize-context

I can start telling that the command itself is implemented, but making tests I find out a case when making minimize-context fails to update correctly the files of repository. I comment the problem in here, however here goes a little summary.

Some "preconditions" to take into account:
1. If exist a tag, I search for dependencies in the patchs after the tag.
2. If happends that not exist dependencies after the tag, the only patch in the context of the bundle to send is the tag. This helps the command darcs apply to merge the patches and seems good to have at least a "tag patch" dependency.
3. (In relation with 1) If not exist a tag, the search is made in all the repository. One problem here is that with repositories that have huge amount of patches (darcs for example with 11000~ patches) the command maybe not finish of calculate the dependencies. Hopefully, having so many patches without tags seems a little odd. Nevertheless, I suppose that even the search in 700~ patches of 10~ patches to send should have a decent performance.

Well, passing to comment the problem. In some older post I mention the way we calculate the dependencies, so with that in mind, suppose we have to repositories $r_1$, $r_2$ with the following patches, where $m_x$ and $a_x$ represents the $x$-th modification and adding respectively.

$r_1$,$r_2$ = $m_2$ $tag$ $m_1$ $a_1$

suppose now that $r_2$ makes a third modification $m_3$ that adds lines without touch any existing line in the only file adding for $a_1$ and sequentially modified for $m_x$. With the idea of send a bundle to $r_1$. Now if we compute the dependencies to find out what is the context to send. For (1) we need to try to commute $m_2$ with $m_3$, which success but of course the end result is a $m'_3$ and a $m'_2$ because the lines which modifies every one now are different. But beyond that for our definition of dependency we can throw $m_2$, so the final context of the bundle with minimize context is the patch $tag$.

The problem now is that if we make darcs apply of the minimized bundle the merge is made not considering $m_2$ and the final state of the file isn't right. For example, if we are talking about that $m_3$ adds a function in some empty place, this could end in $m_3$ adding the function in the middle of an existing function.

My, more or less, mature thought is something like have Direct Dependency and  Indirect Dependency (the names could be differents $\smile$). The Direct Dependency is a dependency as already we know it and the Indirect Dependency is that if we have,

$p_1$ and $p_2$ patches, and $p'_1$ and $p'_2$  are the results of commute the patches, then if $p_1 \ne p'_1$ we conclude that $p_1$ indirectly depends of $p_2$.

I have almost implemented this idea, but I change task and still missing a couple of details. In particular, I'm not so sure of a couple of things,

- How to correctly compare the patches ($p_1 \ne p'_1$)
- In my unclean implementation I have to carry on $MyEq$ for all over the code and it's very ugly I think.

Finishing with this topic, here is a script (improved by Guillaume) that shows the problem:

Implement the "show dependencies" for darcsden

An idea that quickly comes up to my mind is that, considering the last part of the previous topic, since we have two types of dependencies it would be nice generate the graph of dependencies with two types of arrows to differentiate the type of dependency between patches. Talking about the implementation itself, I advanced in the drawing of the graph and some different presentations, but very little about the integration with darcsden, which I think is more or less direct having implemented the $js$ that draw the graph. Would have been nice have more time for finish this but I swap to the task of the following topic.

I hope be able to work in the last two topics in the next few months outside of the GSoC.

Solve the issue2405

I would like to start saying, "what a shame...". I can't solve the issue, I improve a little bit the memory but nothing too much significant. Maybe the good news is that, more o less, I found the "place" in the code where the memory triggers "to the sky" :)

Now, the reality is that I tried so many things that I'm a little bit confused about everything. So, I gonna comment the last feelings and tests that I make and, any question(or idea) for the future person (maybe me) that would try to solve the issue, it would well received.

So things that I tried to change:

- Strict version of Map, Monad, etc.
- More strict version of mapM_, gets and modify.
- Some partials changes in the data type PatchIndex.
- Using darcs as library; differents uses of the functions...

The "place" that I suspect the code has the memory glitch is in $applyPatchMods \rightarrow go (pid, PTouch fn)$I think that my lack of experience dealing with this kind of problem comes to light :) the
bright side is that I learn many things on the way of understand the problem and try different solutions.

Closing, maybe this could be my last post in a long time. I would like to thanks Guillaume and the darcs community in general. It was great to contribute to the development of darcs!

Again, I hope be able to work a little outside the GSoC, in particular in the "dependency problems and tasks".


August 01, 2014

Ale Gadea

Other Week (21-26 July)

August 01, 2014 07:13 AM UTC

Good news!

I almost finish to implement the option minimize-context for the command darcs send, I say almost because making some examples I find out that somethings could go wrong. But before entering in that, I will comment a little the main the test that without minimize-context doesn't work and with the option passes(when the implementation is ready the most likely is I will upload the example and some more in ExamplesRepos), and some "tentatives options" for darcs send that I think could be useful.

So, the minimal example:

Suppose we have repositories $r_1$, $r_2$ and $r_3$; $r_2$ a direct clone of $r_1$ where
originally $r_1$ has only one patch, 

$r_1$,$r_2$ $=$ $p_0$

now, we add a patch with a new file in $r_1$ and make a clone, $r_3$ which leave the repositories like this,

$r_1$,$r_3$ $=$ $p_0$ $p_1$

Suppose that we make a modification in the file that add $p_0$ and make a patch $p'_0$ in $r_1$ and we send a bundle (with darcs send) to $r_2$ and $r_3$. What ends up happening is what one imagine,
the bundle can be applied to $r_3$ but not to $r_2$, this because the bundle has de following "shape":

Some message

patch [Some hash]
Author: ...
Date: ...
  * [The modification to $p_0$]

New patches:




Patch bundle hash: [Some hash]

and $r_2$ doesn't have the patch $p_1$ despite the fact that $p_1$ nothing has to do with $p'_0$. Using the option minimize-context the bundle is the same but the "Context" is:



and now there is no problem.

Now, I find out that reducing the context is not always the "best option" for send a bundle. Here I will expose something that could go wrong. Take for example the darcs-screened repository, in total has 11000~ patches, suppose we add a file and make a bundle (using minimize-context) with only the patch that make the add, the context then is empty. So, if we try to apply this bundle to, say the remote repository, this could never end...
What go wrong?; because the context is empty, making darcs apply [TheBundle] in some point try to merge the entire repository versus the "set" of patches to apply, this is very costly if we have 11000~ patches.

I write "best option" before because with my current solution is not always is better reduce the context, but the final idea is that always be the best option. So, I think is necessary to have some care for example in the last implementation if exist a tag, this tag is added to the context. This simple solution solves the problem and seems correct, on the other hand having more than 600~ or 1000~ patches without a tag seem a little extreme :)

Ending, I'm making some tests of two interesting options that came to mind:

. --last-deps=NUMBER
. --deps-from-tag=REGEXP

The first searches dependencies in the first N patches, and the second search since a given tag.

In conclusion, I'm still doubtful about how solve that problem. More if I have consider the two options. For the end of the week I hope have all this solved.

July 24, 2014

Ale Gadea

Some Week (14-19 July)

July 24, 2014 04:43 AM UTC

Hi all!

I was finishing understanding and implementing the command darcs send --minimize-context using "optimize reorder" when I begin to suspect that doesn't solve the problem described in here. The thing is, despite the fact that the context in the bundle to send is reduced if before we send we make "optimize reorder", this doesn't solve the problem of dependencies. Guillaume finished of evacuate my doubts, and so after read:

[darcs-users] darcs cannot apply some patch bundles
issue1514 (which is the issue which "replace" issue2044 darcs send should do optimize --reorder)

I convince myself of what needs to be done, and it's calculate the "exact" dependencies of the patches to send so such dependencies be the context in the bundle to send. "Exact" because for big repositories can be very costly and calculate till certain tag seem appropriate.

Now, one concern is the cost of doing the search of dependencies. About this I can first comment some of the things I was doing during the week and later show, what I think are, encouraging examples. So first, maybe the most relevant thing of the week it's the implementation of the command darcs show dependencies with the following "description":

Usage: darcs show dependencies [OPTION]... 
Generate the graph of dependencies.

              --from-match=PATTERN  select changes starting with a patch matching PATTERN
              --from-patch=REGEXP   select changes starting with a patch matching REGEXP
              --from-tag=REGEXP     select changes starting with a tag matching REGEXP
              --last=NUMBER         select the last NUMBER patches
              --matches=PATTERN     select patches matching PATTERN
  -p REGEXP   --patches=REGEXP      select patches matching REGEXP
  -t REGEXP   --tags=REGEXP         select tags matching REGEXP
              --disable             disable this command
  -h          --help                shows brief description of command and its arguments

till the moment the command returns a graph described in dot language, this can eventually change. But with the current returned value one can do:

$\$$ darcs show dep | dot -Tpdf -o deps.pdf

to draw the graph in a pdf. Finally, in summary to calculate the dependencies I use more or less the idea which describes Ganesh in here.

Moving to the examples is interesting, thinking in the performance of the implementation of darcs send --minimize-context using this approach, to see the followings results:

1. Show the dependencies after the tag 2.9.9 (75 patches)
$ time darcs show dep --from-tag=2.9.9
real 0m0.397s
user 0m0.373s
sys 0m0.026s

2. Show the dependencies after the tag 2.9.8 (133 patches)
$ time darcs show dep --from-tag=2.9.8
real 0m2.951s
user 0m2.865s
sys 0m0.082s

3. Show the dependencies after the tag 2.9.7 (288 patches)
$ time darcs show dep --from-tag=2.9.7
real 0m26.654s
user 0m26.003s
sys 0m0.511s

4. Show the dependencies after the tag 2.9.6 (358 patches)
$ time darcs show dep --from-tag=2.9.6
real 0m39.019s
user 0m38.302s
sys 0m0.666s

5. Show the dependencies after the tag 2.9.5 (533 patches)
$ time darcs show dep --from-tag=2.9.5
real 1m53.730s
user 1m51.343s
sys 0m1.939s

Rushed conclusion, seems the performance is quite good even more if we think that for compute the graph dependencies we calculate the dependencies of "all the selected patches against all the selected patches" and in the case of the option for send would only require to calculate "patches to send against all the selected patches".

July 15, 2014

Ale Gadea

Month of June

July 15, 2014 01:43 AM UTC

Here goes a little summary of what I been doing between late june (9~21) and early july (1~11).

First and easy, I have been documenting Darcs.misplacedPatches (old name chooseOrder), D.P.W.Ordered and D.P.W.Sealed. Something to comment is that the semantics of misplacedPatches, not always can clean a tag doing darcs optimize reorder. For example; Suppose we have a repository, $r_1$ with the following patches;

$r_1$ $=$ $t_{1,0}$ $p_{1,0}$ $t_{1,1}$

here all tags are clean, but if we make another repository, say $r_2$, and we pull from $r_1$ of the
following way

$\$$ darcs pull -a -p $p_{1,0}$ $r_1$ (we want to pull the patch $p_{1,0}$, we assume that the name of the patch is $p_{1,0}$ for the matching with -p option)
$\$$ darcs pull -a $r_1$

so now we have,

$r_2$ $=$ $p_{1,0}$ $t_{1,0}$ $t_{1,1}$

and we see that $t_{1,0}$ is dirty. Doing darcs optimize reorder not reorder nothing. What is going on is that to know what reorder, misplacePatches takes the first tag, in our case $t_{1,1}$, and
"search" for what patches he don't tag. But $p_{1,0}$ and $t_{1,0}$ are tagged by $t_{1,1}$ so there is nothing to reorder despite $t_{1,0}$ is dirty. Therefore there is no way of clean $t_{1,0}$ because misplacePatches always takes the first tag, so if a tag is tagging one or more dirty tags, this tags never be available to get clean.

"Second", using the implementation of "reorder" one can get almost for free the option --reorder for the commands pull, apply and rebase pull. The behavior for the case of pull (for the others commands is the same basic idea) is that our local patches remain on top after a pull from a remote repository, e.i. suppose we have the followings $l$(ocal) and $r$(emote) repositories,

$l$ $=$ $p_1$ $p_2$ $\ldots$ $p_n$ $lp_{n+1}$ $\ldots$ $lp_m$

$r$ $=$ $p_1$ $p_2$ $\ldots$ $p_n$ $rp_{n+1}$ $\ldots$ $rp_k$

where $lp$ are the local patches that don't belong to $r$, and vice versa for $rp$. Make darcs pull, leaves $l$ as follow,

$l$ $=$ $p_1$ $p_2$ $\ldots$ $p_n$ $lp_{n+1}$ $\ldots$ $lp_m$ $rp_{n+1}$ $\ldots$ $rp_k$

meanwhile make darcs pull --reorder, leaves $l$,

$l$ $=$ $p_1$ $p_2$ $\ldots$ $p_n$ $rp_{n+1}$ $\ldots$ $rp_k$ $lp_{n+1}$ $\ldots$ $lp_m$

making more easy to send the $lp$ patches later.

"Third", beginning a new task, implement option minimize-context for command darcs send. Still no much to comment, I have almost finished implementing the option but with some doubts, I hope that for the end of the week have a more "prettier" implementation as well as a better understanding.

June 25, 2014

Darcs News

darcs news #104

June 25, 2014 04:59 AM UTC

News and discussions

  1. Google Summer of Code 2013 has begun! BSRK and José will post updates on their blogs:

Issues resolved (8)

issue2163 Radoslav Dorcik
issue2227 Ganesh Sittampalam
issue2248 Ganesh Sittampalam
issue2250 BSRK Aditya
issue2311 Sebastian Fischer
issue2312 Sebastian Fischer
issue2320 Jose Luis Neder
issue2321 Jose Luis Neder

Patches applied (20)

See darcs wiki entry for details.

darcs news #105

June 25, 2014 04:58 AM UTC

News and discussions

  1. This year's Google Summer of Code projects brought a lot of improvements to darcs and its ecosystem!
  2. Gian Piero Carrubba asked why adjacent hunks could not commute:
  3. We listed the changes that occurred between version 2.8.4 and the current development branch into a 2.10 release page:

Issues resolved (8)

issue346 Jose Luis Neder
issue1828 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2181 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2309 Owen Stephens
issue2313 Jose Luis Neder
issue2334 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2343 Jose Luis Neder
issue2347 Guillaume Hoffmann

Patches applied (39)

See darcs wiki entry for details.

Darcs News #106

June 25, 2014 04:58 AM UTC

News and discussions

  1. Darcs is participating once again to the Google Summer of Code, through the umbrella organization Deadline for student application is Friday 21st:
  2. It is now possible to donate stock to darcs through the Software Freedom Conservancy organization. Donations by Paypal, Flattr, checks and wire transfer are still possible:
  3. Dan Licata wrote a presentation about Darcs as a higher inductive type:
  4. Darcs now directly provides import and export commands with Git. This code was adapted from Petr Rockai's darcs-fastconvert, with some changes by Owen Stephen from his Summer of Code project "darcs-bridge":

Issues resolved (6)

issue642 Jose Luis Neder
issue2209 Jose Luis Neder
issue2319 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2332 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2335 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2348 Ryan

Patches applied (34)

See darcs wiki entry for details.

Darcs News #108

June 25, 2014 04:57 AM UTC

News and discussions

  1. We have a few updates from the Google Summer of Code projects. Alejandro Gadea about history reordering:
  2. Marcio Diaz about the cache system:
  3. Incremental fast-export is now provided to ease maintenance of git mirrors:

Issues resolved (8)

issue2244 Ale Gadea
issue2314 Benjamin Franksen
issue2361 Ale Gadea
issue2364 Sergei Trofimovich
issue2364 Sergei Trofimovich
issue2388 Owen Stephens
issue2394 Guillaume Hoffmann
issue2396 Guillaume Hoffmann

Patches applied (39)

See darcs wiki entry for details.

June 12, 2014

Ale Gadea

Third Week (02-06 june)

June 12, 2014 04:58 PM UTC

Well, well... Now with the solution already implemented here are a couple of time tests that show the improvement.

For the repository of the issue2361:

Before patch1169
"let it run for 2 hours and it did not finish"

After patch1169
real    0m5.929s
user    0m5.683s
sys     0m0.260s

For the repository generated by, that in summarize has 12600~ patches, a bundle unrevert and doing reorden implies move 1100~ patches forward passing by 11500~ patches.

Before patch1169
real    73m9.894s
user    71m28.256s
sys     1m11.439s

After patch1169
real    2m23.405s
user    2m17.347s
sys     0m6.030s

The repository generated by has 600~ patches, with only one tag and a very small bundle unrevert.

Before patch1169
real        0m34.049s
user        0m33.386s
sys         0m0.665s

After patch1169
real        0m1.053s
user        0m0.960s
sys         0m0.152s

One last repository generated by, has 13 patches and a really big bundle unrevert (~10MB).

Before patch1169
real    0m1.304s
user    0m0.499s
sys     0m0.090s

After patch1169
real    0m0.075s
user    0m0.016s
sys     0m0.011s

The repository with more examples is in here: ExamplesRepos.

June 05, 2014

Ale Gadea

Second Week (26-30 may)

June 05, 2014 06:47 PM UTC

Luckily, this week with Guillaume we found a "solution" for the issue 2361. But before of entering in details, let's review how the command darcs optimize --reorder does for reorder the patches.

So, suppose we have the following repositories than, reading it from left to right we have the first patch till the last patch, besides with $p_{i,j}$ we denote the $i$-th patch who belongs to the $j$-th repository, and when we want to specify that a patch $p_{i,j}$ is a tag we write $t_{i,j}$.

$r_1$ $=$ $p_{1,1}$ $p_{2,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{n,1}$ $p_{n+1,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{m,1}$

$r_2$ $=$ $p_{1,1}$ $p_{2,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{n,1}$ $p_{1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{k,2}$ $t_{1,2}$ $p_{k+1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{l,2}$

where the red part represent when $r_2$ was cloned from $r_1$, and the rest is how each repository was evolved. Now, suppose we make a merge of $r_1$ and $r_2$ in $r_1$ making a bundle of the patches of $r_2$ and appling it in $r_1$. Thus, after the merge we have that

$r_1$ $=$ $p_{1,1}$ $p_{2,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{n,1}$ $p_{n+1,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{m,1}$ $p_{1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{k,2}$ $t_{1,2}$ $p_{k+1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{l,2}$

and we found the situation where the tag $t_{1,2}$ is dirty because the green part is in the middle. And now we are in conditions of finding out how darcs does the reorder of patches.
So, the first task is to select the first tag seeing $r_1$ in the reverse way, suppose $t_{1,2}$ is the first (ie, $p_{k+1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{l,2}$ are not tags), and split the set of patches (the repository) in

$ps_{t_{1,2}}$ $=$ $p_{1,1}$ $p_{2,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{n,1}$ $p_{1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{k,2}$ $t_{1,2}$

and the rest of the patch set,

$rest$ $=$ $p_{n+1,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{m,1}$ $p_{k+1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{l,2}$

this is done by splitOnTag, which I don't totally understand yet, so for the moment... simply do the above :) Then, the part that interest us now is $rest$, we want to delete all the patches of $rest$ that exist in $r_1$ and then add them again, causing that they show up to the right. This job is done by tentativelyReplacePatches, which first calls tentativelyRemovePatches and then calls tentativelyAddPatches.

So, tentativelyRemovePatches of $r_1$ and $rest$ makes,

$r_{1}'$ $=$ $p_{1,1}$ $p_{2,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{n,1}$ $p_{1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{k,2}$ $t_{1,2}$

and, tentativelyAddPatches of $r_{1}'$ and $rest$,

$r_{1}''$ $=$ $p_{1,1}$ $p_{2,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{n,1}$ $p_{1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{k,2}$ $t_{1,2}$ $p_{n+1,1}$ $\ldots$ $p_{m,1}$  $p_{k+1,2}$ $\ldots$ $p_{l,2}$

leaving $t_{1,2}$ clean.

Well, all of this was for understanding the "solution" for the issue, we are almost there but before let's look at the function tentativelyRemovePatches. It attempts to remove patches with one special care: when one does darcs revert, a special file is generated, called unrevert in _darcs/patches, which is used for darcs unrevert in case that one makes a mistake with darcs revert. One important difference with unrevert is that unlike all the other files in _darcs/patches, unrevert in not a patch but a bundle, that contains a patch and a context. This context allows to know if the patch is applicable. So when one removes a patch (running for example oblitarete, unrecord or amend) that patch has to be removed from the bundle-revert (bundle of the file _darcs/patches/unrevert). It's now always possible to adjust the unrevert bundle, in which case, the operation continues only if the user agrees to delete the unrevert bundle.

But now a question emerge. Is it necessary to accommodate the bundle-revert in the case of reorder?; the answer is no, and it's because we don't delete any patch of $r_1$ so we still can apply the bundle-revert in $r_{1}''$.

So, finally! we find out that for reorder we need a special case of removing, which doesn't try to update the unrevert bundle. And this ends up being the "solution" for the issue, since the reorder blocks in that function. But! beyond this solves the issue something weird is happening, that is the reason of the double quotes for solution :)

This is more o less the step forward for now. The tasks ahead are, documenting the code in various parts and make the special case for the function tentativelyRemovePatches. On the way I will probably understand more about some of the functions that I mention before so probably I will add more info and rectify whatever is needed.

June 03, 2014

Ale Gadea

Google Summer of Code 2014 - Darcs

June 03, 2014 06:46 PM UTC

Hi hi all!

I have been accepted in the GSoC 2014 :) , as part of the work I'll be writing about my progress. The original plan is have a summary per week (or at least I hope so jeje).

I have already been reading some of the code of darcs and fixing some issues;

Issue 2263 ~ Patch 1126
Issue 1416 ~ Patch 1135
- Issue 2244 ~ Patch 1147 (needs-screening) (not any more $\ddot\smile$)

The details about the project is in History Reordering Performance and Features. Also some issues about the project are;

Issue 2361
Issue 2044


First Week (19-23 may)

June 03, 2014 06:42 PM UTC

Sadly, a first slow week, I lost the monday with problems with my notebook for which I have to reinstall ghc, cabal, all the libraries, etc.. but! in the end this helped :)

The list of taks of the week include:

1. Compile and run darcs with profiling flags
2. Write scripts to generate dirty-tagged big repositories
3. Check memory usage with hp2any for the command optimize --reorder for the
generated repositories and repo-issue2361
4. Check performance difference with and without patch-index
5. Document reorder implementation on wiki
6. Actually debug/optimize reorder of issue2361 (Stretch goal)

1. Compile and run darcs with prolfiling flags

This seems pretty easy at first, but turned somewhat annoying because one have to install all the libraries with the option profiling. So a mini-step-by-step of the my installation of darcs with profiling
flags is (i'm using ubuntu 14.04, ghc-7.6.3 and cabal-install- :

- Install ghc-prof package, in my case with sudo apt-get install ghc-prof
- Install depencencies of darcs with enable-library-profiling, doing:
    - $ cabal install LIB --enable-library-profiling ( for each library :) )
    - or setting in ~/.cabal/config, library-profiling: True
- Finaly install darcs with enable-library-profiling and enable-executable-profiling

2. Write scripts to generate dirty-tagged big repositories

About this no much to say, I did some libraries to make the scripts that generates the repositories more straightforward. And I wrote some examples, but still in search of interesting examples. A long the week probably I will add examples, hopefully interesting.

3, 4 and 5 all together and mixed

Now, when finally start to generate the examples repositories and play with hp2ps to check differents things, I started to think about others things and I ended up studing the implementation of the command optimize --reorder, in particular I start to write a version which print some info during the ordering of patches, but for now is very dirty implementation.

November 03, 2013

Simon Michael

darcsum 1.3

November 03, 2013 07:38 PM UTC

darcsum was hanging again, so I made some updates:

And since I came this far, I’ll tag and announce darcsum 1.3. Hurrah!

This release includes many fixes from Dave Love and one from Simon Marlow. Here are the release notes.

Site and ELPA package updates will follow asap. All help is welcome.

September 26, 2013

Simon Michael

darcsden/darcs hub GSOC complete

September 26, 2013 11:48 AM UTC

Aditya BSRK’s darcsden-improvement GSOC has concluded, and I’ve recently merged almost all of the pending work and deployed it on darcs hub.

You can always see the recently landed changes here, but let me describe the latest features a little more:

File history - when you browse a file, there’s a new “file changes” button which shows just the changes affecting that file.

File annotate - there’s also a new “annotate” button, providing the standard view showing which commit last touched each line of the file. (also known as the blame/praise feature). It needs some CSS polish but I’m glad that the basic side-by-side layout is there.

More reliable highlighting while editing - the file editor was failing to highlight many common programming languages - this should be working better now. (Note highlighting while viewing and highlighting while editing are independent and probably use different colour schemes, this is a known open wishlist item.)

Repository compare - when viewing a repo’s branches, there’s a new “compare” button which lets you compare (and merge from) any two public repos on darcs hub, showing the unique patches on each side.

Cosmetic fixes - various minor layout and rendering issues were fixed. One point of discussion was whether to use the two-sided layout on the repo branches page as well. Since there wasn’t time to make that really usable I vetoed it in favour of the less confusing one-sided layout. I think showing both sides works well on the compare page though.

Patch bundle support - the last big feature of the GSOC was patch bundles. This is an alternative to the fork repo/request merge workflow, intended to be more lightweight and easy for casual contributors. There are two parts. First, darcs hub issue trackers can now store darcs patch bundle files (one per issue I think). This means patches can be uploaded to an issue, much like the current Darcs issue/patch tracker. But you can also browse and merge patches directly from a bundle, just as you can from another repo.

The second part (not yet deployed) is support for a previously unused feature built in to the darcs send command, which can post patches directly to a url instead of emailing them. The idea (championed by Aditya and Ganesh) is to make it very easy for someone to darcs send patches upstream to the project’s issue tracker, without having to fork a repo, or even create an account on darcs hub. As you can imagine, some safeguards are important to avoid becoming a spam vector or long-term maintenance headache, but the required change(s) are small and I hope we’ll have this piece working soon. It should be interesting to have both workflows available and see which works where.

I won’t recap the older new features, except to say that pack support is in need of more testing. If you ever find darcs get to be slow, perhaps you’d like to help test and troubleshoot packs, since they can potentially make this much faster. Also there are a number of low-hanging UI improvements we can make, and more (relatively easy) bugs keep landing in the darcs hub/darcsden issue tracker. It’s a great time to hack on darcs hub/darcsden and every day make it a little more fun and efficient to work with.

I really appreciate Aditya’s work, and that of his mentor, Ganesh Sittampalam. We did a lot of code review which was not always easy across a large time zone gap, but I think the results were good. Congratulations Aditya on completing the GSOC and delivering many useful features, which we can put to good use immediately. Thanks!

August 09, 2013

Simon Michael

darcs hub, hledger, game dev

August 09, 2013 10:01 AM UTC

Hello blog. Since last time I’ve been doing plenty of stuff, but not telling you about it. Let’s do a bullet list and move on..

darcsden/darcs hub


FunGEn & game dev

A sudden burst of activity here.

July 24, 2013

Simon Michael

darcs hub repo stats, hledger balance sheet

July 24, 2013 02:50 AM UTC

Recent activity:

I fixed another clumsy query on darcs hub, making the all repos page faster. Experimented with user and repo counts on the front page. I like it, but haven’t deployed to production yet. It costs about a quarter of a second in page load time (one 50ms couch query to fetch all repos, plus my probably-suboptimal filtering and sorting).

I’ve finally learned how many of those names on the front page have (public) repos behind them (144 out of 319), and how many private repos there are (125, higher than expected!).

Thinking about what is really most useful to have on the front page. Keep listing everything ? Just top 5 in various categories ? Ideas welcome.

Did a bunch of bookkeeping today, which inspired my first hledger commit in a while. I found the balancesheet command (abbreviation: bs) highly useful for a quick snapshot of assets and liabilities to various depths (add –depth N). The Equity section was just a distraction though, and I think it will be to most hledger users for the time being, so I removed it.

July 23, 2013

Simon Michael

hub hacking

July 23, 2013 12:30 AM UTC

More darcs hub activity, including some actual app development (yay):

Added news links to the front page.

Cleaned up hub’s docs repo and updated the list of blockers on the roadmap.

Updated/closed a number of issues, including the app-restarting #58, thanks to a fast highlighting-kate fix by John McFarlane.

Tested and configured the issue-closing commit posthook in the darcsden trunk repo. Commits pushed/merged there whose message contains the regex (closes #([0-9]+)|resolves #([0-9]+)|fixes #([0-9]+)) will now close the specified issue, with luck.

Consolidated a number of modules to help with code navigation, to be pushed soon.

Improved the redirect destination when deleting or forking repos or creating/commenting/closing issues.

Fixed a silly whitespace issue when viewing a patch, where the author name and date run together. I’m still confused about the specific code that generates this - the code I expect uses tables but firebug shows divs. A mystery for another day..

July 22, 2013

Simon Michael

hub speedups

July 22, 2013 12:30 AM UTC

More darcs hub hacking today.

July 21, 2013

Simon Michael

darcsden 1.1, darcs hub news

July 21, 2013 03:00 PM UTC

I’ve been hacking (mostly on darcsden/hub) but not blogging recently. Must get back to the old 45-15 minute routine.

darcsden 1.1 released

darcsden 1.1 is now available on hackage! This is the updated version of darcsden which runs, so these changes are also relevant to that site’s users. (More darcs hub news below.)

darcsden is a web application for browsing and managing darcs repositories, issues, and users, plus a basic SSH server which lets users push changes without a system login. It is released under the BSD license. You can use it: - cabal package - source - bug tracker

Release notes for 1.1



Brand new, from the Enhancing Darcsden GSOC (some WIP):

Detailed change log:

How to help

darcsden is a small, clean codebase that is fun to hack on. Discussion takes place on the #darcs IRC channel, and useful changes will quickly be deployed at, providing a tight dogfooding/feedback loop. Here’s how to contribute a patch there:

  1. register at
  2. add your ssh key in settings so you can push
  3. fork your own branch: , fork
  4. copy to your machine: darcs get
  5. make changes, darcs record
  6. push to hub: darcs push --set-default
  7. your change will appear at
  8. discuss on #darcs, or ping me (sm, to merge it


Alex Suraci created darcsden. Simon Michael led this release, which includes contributions from Alp Mestanogullari, Jeffrey Chu, Ganesh Sittampalam, and BSRK Aditya (sponsored by Google’s Summer of Code). And last time I forgot to mention two 1.0 contributors: Bertram Felgenhauer and Alex Suraci.

darcsden depends on Darcs, Snap, GHC, and other fine projects from the Haskell ecosystem, as well as Twitter Bootstrap, JQuery, and many more.

darcs hub news 2013/07 , aka darcs hub, is the darcs repository hosting site I operate. It’s like a mini github, but using darcs. You can:

The site was announced on 2012/9/15 ( Since then:

Please try it out, report problems, and contribute patches to make it better.